September 23, 2023 11:17 pm

Scientists Post “Strong Concern Regarding Unadjusted Confounding” in a Widely-spread Israeli Observational Study to Justify the First Pfizer Boosters

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
WhatsApp
Telegram

URGENT: JUST 11 DAYS REMAIN TO HELP SAVE INDEPENDENT MEDIA & ANR, TO ENSURE WE ARE FULLY FUNDED FOR NEXT MONTH,SO LET'S CUT THE BS & GET TO THE POINT - WE WILL BE FORCED LAY OFF STAFF & REDUCE OPERATIONS UNLESS WE ARE FULLY FUNDED WITHIN THE NEXT 2 WEEKS - Sadly, less than 0.5% of readers currently donate or subscribe to us But YOU can easily change that. Imagine the impact we'd make if 3 in 10 readers supported us today. To start with we’d remove this annoying banner as we could fight for a full year...

Scientists Post “Strong Concern Regarding Unadjusted Confounding” in a Widely-spread Israeli Observational Study to Justify the First Pfizer Boosters

NEW – Scientists post “strong concern regarding unadjusted confounding” in a widely-spread Israeli observational study to justify the first Pfizer boosters.

Potential “Healthy Vaccinee Bias” in a Study of BNT162b2 Vaccine against Covid-19

Using observational methods, Arbel et al. (Dec. 23, 2021, issue) calculated an adjusted 90% lower mortality due to Covid-19 among participants who received a first BNT162b2 vaccine (Pfizer–BioNTech) booster than among those who did not receive a booster. They found 65 Covid-19–associated deaths (reported as 0.16 per 100,000 persons per day) among participants in the booster group and 137 (reported as 2.98 per 100,000 persons per day) among those in the nonbooster group — a 94.6% difference. In a subsequent letter (March 10, 2022, issue) Arbel et al. reported 441 deaths not related to Covid-19 in the booster group and 963 deaths not related to Covid-19 in the nonbooster group.

We did not have access to the data and could not account for the timing of the receipt of boosters or adjust for the covariates included in the analyses. However, using the person-days of exposure included in the 2021 article by Arbel et al. and the deaths not related to Covid-19 reported in the subsequent letter, we estimated the mortality not related to Covid-19, according to vaccination status, with the following formula: the ratios of total deaths not related to Covid-19 to Covid-19–related deaths, according to vaccination group, multiplied by mortality due to Covid-19, according to vaccination group, which accounts for person-days of exposure. The mortality not related to Covid-19 was calculated as (441/65)×0.16=1.09 per 100,000 persons per day in the booster group as compared with (963/137)×2.98=20.95 per 100,000 persons per day in the nonbooster group. This corresponds to a 94.8% lower mortality not related to Covid-19 among participants in the booster group and indicates a markedly lower incidence of adverse health outcomes in the booster group.

Underlying health plays a substantial role in Covid-19–related mortality. The unadjusted differences in mortality related to Covid-19 and mortality not related to Covid-19, according to vaccination status, were essentially the same in the 2021 study by Arbel and colleagues. These findings arouse strong concern regarding unadjusted confounding. The adjusted 90% lower mortality due to Covid-19 reported among the participants who received a booster cannot, with certainty, be attributed to boosting. “Healthy vaccinee bias” in this population may have also led to overestimates of vaccine effectiveness in similar studies from Clalit Health Services. Inclusion of mortality not related to Covid-19 in all observational Covid-19 vaccine studies would provide important context.

Tracy B. Høeg, M.D., Ph.D.
University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

Ram Duriseti, M.D., Ph.D.
Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA

Vinay Prasad, M.D., M.P.H.
University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this letter was reported.

——————————-

Original source:
https://t.me/disclosetv/11590
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2306683

Opinion pieces don’t necessarily reflect the position of our news site but of our Opinion writers.

Original Source: Scientists Post “Strong Concern Regarding Unadjusted Confounding” in a Widely-spread Israeli Observational Study to Justify the First Pfizer Boosters

Support the ANR from as little as $8 – it only takes a minute. If you can, please consider supporting us with a regular amount each month. Thank you.

Related News

Subscribe for free to our ANR news emails and access 2 free ebooks plus Reports to share with family and friends about Covid fraud and the danger of the vaccines.

Australian National Review is Australia’s first real free and independent press, one with no editorial control by the elite, but a publication that can generate critical thinkers and critical debate and hold those spreading mistruths and deliberate propaganda in mainstream media to account.

News with a difference that will be educational, compelling and create a platform for political and social change in this country and address the real issues facing this country and the world.

Watch Full Documentary

URGENT: JUST 3 DAYS REMAIN TO HELP SAVE INDEPENDENT MEDIA & ANR, SO LET'S CUT THE BS & GET TO THE POINT - WE WILL BE FORCED TO LAY OFF STAFF & REDUCE OPERATIONS UNLESS WE ARE FULLY FUNDED WITHIN THE NEXT 2 WEEKS

Sadly, less than 0.5% of readers currently donate or subscribe to us But YOU can easily change that. Imagine the impact we'd make if 3 in 10 readers supported us today. To start with we’d remove this annoying banner as we could fight for a full year...

Get access to TruthMed- how to save your family and friends that have been vaxx with vaccine detox, & how the Unvaxxed can prevent spike protein infection from the jabbed.

Free with ANR Subscription from $8

Download the Full PDF - THE COVID-19 FRAUD & WAR ON HUMANITY