To avoid WW3 It Might Be A Good Idea To Learn Who Started WW2, And How To Stop The Same Elite Families Doing It Again, And Then Re Writing The History Books To Lie To Future Generations Just Like We All Have Been Lied To Since Birth, About WW2
To avoid WW3 it might be a good idea to learn who started WW2, and how to stop the same elite families from doing it again, and then rewriting the history books to lie to future generations just like we all have been lied to since birth, about WW2. Is the truth too uncomfortable, or is it too much of a cozy feeling, to continue to believe mainstream media doesn’t lie and hasn’t lied about who started WW2?
Question 1: Hitler
Let’s start with Hitler. In the West, it is universally accepted that:
1. Hitler started WW2
2. Hitler’s invasion of Poland was the first step in a broader campaign aimed at world domination
Is this interpretation of WW2 true or false? And, if it is false, then—in your opinion—what was Hitler trying to achieve in Poland and could WW2 have been avoided?
Ron Unz—Until the last dozen years or so, my views on historical events had always been fairly conventional, formed from the classes I’d taken in college and the uniform media narrative I’d absorbed over the decades. This included my understanding of World War II, the greatest military conflict in human history, whose outcome had shaped our modern world.
But in the years after the 9/11 Attacks and the Iraq War, I’d grown more and more suspicious of the honesty of our mainstream media, and begun to recognize that history books often merely represent a congealed version of such past media distortions. The growth of the Internet has unleashed a vast quantity of unorthodox ideas of all possible flavors and since 2000 I’d been working on a project to digitize the archives of our leading publications of the last 150 years, which gave me convenient access to information not easily available to anyone else. So, as I later wrote: