“Is it safe?”
By STEVE KIRSCH
The only world government that is anywhere close to answering that question for any vaccine is the UK. I’ll explain why I believe this. I think you’ll agree with me.
The famous scene in Marathon Man where Dustin Hoffman is asked repeatedly “Is it safe?” This is what we should be asking of our health agencies. We shouldn’t stop asking until they give us the data.
Executive summary
The question you should be asking before you get any vaccine is “Is it safe?”
The standard of safety used for vaccines is fewer than 1 death per 1M doses (see this Paul Offit quote).
Double-blind randomized trials are never powered with millions of people so the only way we can learn this information is by collecting the data in the post-marketing phase by looking at the vaccine records of people who died and doing the analysis on that data.
As far as I know, nobody in the world has ever exposed the underlying anonymized data or exposed accurate summary analysis template that would allow us to learn the truth.
In short, for the last 220 years, doctors have all been basing their recommendations that the vaccines are safe on trust, not reliable data.
Shouldn’t we get started so we can finally answer the question: “Is it safe?”
Data collection steps
Here are the 4 steps you need to do to figure out if a vaccine is safe:
- Do a join between the death records and vaccine records so you have the vaccination data on the same row as the death data. So a row looks like: Age range, gender, date of death and dates and types for each vaccination
- You will also need access to the vaccination data by date, age range, and sex by week (similar to the California data here).
- Once you have this underlying data, you are able to create a summary analysis spreadsheet that looks something like this (note that clicking on the link will instantly download the spreadsheet and then refresh the page so it will look like nothing happened).
- From that spreadsheet, it will immediately be obvious if the vaccine is safe or not.
Has anyone done this?
Here’s the question: Have you ever seen a spreadsheet like that for any vaccine?
The closest effort I’m aware of is the data from the UK, but the data in the spreadsheet they provide is simply not accurate and not credible because they under count the unvaccinated. This is instantly obvious to anyone with a trained eye because the unvaxxed are instantly dying at twice the rate that they did moments before the vaccine rolled out:
Professor Norman Fenton, Martin Neil, Dr. Clare Craig, and others found the same deficiencies in the UK data before I ever set eyes on the data.
Furthermore, the summary is not fit for purpose because it isn’t granular enough to really see what is going on (there is nothing magical about 21 days; you want to see what is going on in all periods). If you compare my spreadsheet with theirs, you’ll see what I mean.
So here’s my question:
Have you ever seen the spreadsheet template in Step #3 for any vaccine ever from anywhere in the world containing reliable data?
The answer, as far as I know, is “No.” The closest I’ve seen is the UK data. Hats off to them.
Which means:
- For the past 200+ years, we’ve been assuming vaccines are safe because nobody has bothered to check it properly
- Nobody in the mainstream medical community in the US, as far as I know, has been demanding to see this analysis.
Why am I calling for this?
I’m calling for data transparency and doing it right so we will finally know whether vaccines are safe or not.
Two reasons:
- It needs to be done
- Nobody else is doing it
What is going on now is frightening
Here is Chelsea Clinton calling vaccine hesitancy and rejection of vaccines as “unfortunate”:
WTF?!?! I think it’s just the opposite.
People should be very vaccine hesitant because the health authorities have simply never delivered on the data showing the vaccines are safe.
And there’s a reason for that of course. We all know what it is. They aren’t delivering the data on the safety of the vaccine because they know it is not safe.
This is why all the world government agencies I’ve asked refuse to provide the data, even if I offer to pay all the costs. They just stop talking to me.
I totally disagree with Chelsea Clinton on health authorities power.
The health authorities should be stripped of their emergency powers because they misused them by requiring lockdowns, masking, and vaccination. It was a disaster. There were no checks on their power.
Did you ever hear of any health authorities saying “We’re not doing vaccinations until we make the data public for everyone to see”? I never saw this. Did I miss it?
Summary
The CDC needs to show us the data before we can answer the question, “Is it safe?”
This is best done by publicly providing, for the first time in history, individual death-vax records and vaccination records. This will then enable any member of the public to construct a summary template similar to the template described in this article. Using that template, it will be immediately obvious to everyone what is going on.
At that point, everyone will know the truth.
Wouldn’t that be nice for a change?
Until then, you should just say “No” or “Show me the data.”
And in the meantime, do everything you can to strip these “health authorities” of their emergency power. They should persuade people by the data, not by coercion.
