October 4, 2023 3:22 pm

NEW SAFETY CONCERNS RAISED ABOUT THE QUANTITIES OF ALUMINIUM IN CHILDHOOD VACCINES

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
WhatsApp
Telegram

URGENT: JUST 11 DAYS REMAIN TO HELP SAVE INDEPENDENT MEDIA & ANR, TO ENSURE WE ARE FULLY FUNDED FOR NEXT MONTH,SO LET'S CUT THE BS & GET TO THE POINT - WE WILL BE FORCED LAY OFF STAFF & REDUCE OPERATIONS UNLESS WE ARE FULLY FUNDED WITHIN THE NEXT 2 WEEKS - Sadly, less than 0.5% of readers currently donate or subscribe to us But YOU can easily change that. Imagine the impact we'd make if 3 in 10 readers supported us today. To start with we’d remove this annoying banner as we could fight for a full year...

By NEWPORT BEACH, CALIF

Landmark FDA Paper on Aluminum Safety in Vaccines Has Crucial Math Error

Physicians for Informed Consent Reports on ResearchGate

“NEWPORT BEACH, CALIF. (PRWEB) March 6, 2020

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), a division of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), have raised concerns about the negative effects of aluminum exposure in humans.

Because some vaccines contain aluminum, the FDA published a paper in 2011 (Mitkus et al.) to address concerns about aluminum exposure from vaccines in infants. The paper compared the aluminum exposure from vaccines in infants to a safety limit of oral aluminum determined by the ATSDR.

However, THIS STUDY INCORRECTLY BASED ITS CALCULATIONS on 0.78% of oral aluminum being absorbed into the bloodstream rather than the value of 0.1% used by the ATSDR in its computations.

As a result, THE FDA PAPER ASSUMED THAT NEARLY 8 (0.78%/0.1%) TIMES MORE ALUMINIUM CAN SAFELY ENTER THE BLOODSTREAM, and this led the authors to incorrectly conclude that aluminum exposure from vaccines was well below the safety limit.

Shockingly this could mean that the aluminium injected daily into one day old babies is well above any safe limit.

Physicians for Informed Consent (PIC), an educational nonprofit organization dedicated to delivering data on infectious diseases and vaccines, posted a detailed description of this error today on ResearchGate.

Dr. Christopher Shaw, professor at the University of British Columbia, has performed numerous studies on the effects of injected aluminum on mice, and commented:

“We knew that the Mitkus et al. paper modeling aluminum clearance had to be inaccurate since it was assuming that injected aluminum kinetics were the same as the kinetics of aluminum acquired through diet. Now, in addition, we see that THEY DID THEIR MODELING BASED ON USING INCORRECT LEVELS OF ALUMINIUM ABSORPTION.

What is particularly striking is that despite all these errors, SINCE 2011, Mitkus et al. (This possibly heavily flawed paper) IS USED BY CDC AND OTHER ENTITIES AS THE BASIS FOR CLAIMING THAT ALUMINIUM ADJUVANTS ARE SAFE”

Dr. Shira Miller, president of Physicians for Informed Consent (PIC), said, “We posted the Mitkus 2011 erratum on ResearchGate in hopes of bringing it to the attention of scientists and researchers who are interested in the safety of the quantities of injected aluminum found in childhood vaccines and would be in a position to further research the safety concern.”

I know of one dedicated scientist who is currently working to prove that this error in calculations of a safe amount of aluminium in vaccines is harming many people, I hope soon that they and others, can provide proof to immediately stop the production and use of any vaccine with aluminium.

https://www.prweb.com/releases/physicians_for_informed_consent_reports_on_researchgate_landmark_fda_paper_on_aluminum_safety_in_vaccines_has_crucial_math_error/prweb16960398.htm

Opinion pieces don’t necessarily reflect the position of our news site but of our Opinion writers.

Original Source: NEW SAFETY CONCERNS RAISED ABOUT THE QUANTITIES OF ALUMINIUM IN CHILDHOOD VACCINES

Support the ANR from as little as $8 – it only takes a minute. If you can, please consider supporting us with a regular amount each month. Thank you.

Related News

Subscribe for free to our ANR news emails and access 2 free ebooks plus Reports to share with family and friends about Covid fraud and the danger of the vaccines.

Australian National Review is Australia’s first real free and independent press, one with no editorial control by the elite, but a publication that can generate critical thinkers and critical debate and hold those spreading mistruths and deliberate propaganda in mainstream media to account.

News with a difference that will be educational, compelling and create a platform for political and social change in this country and address the real issues facing this country and the world.

Watch Full Documentary

URGENT: JUST 3 DAYS REMAIN TO HELP SAVE INDEPENDENT MEDIA & ANR, SO LET'S CUT THE BS & GET TO THE POINT - WE WILL BE FORCED TO LAY OFF STAFF & REDUCE OPERATIONS UNLESS WE ARE FULLY FUNDED WITHIN THE NEXT 2 WEEKS

Sadly, less than 0.5% of readers currently donate or subscribe to us But YOU can easily change that. Imagine the impact we'd make if 3 in 10 readers supported us today. To start with we’d remove this annoying banner as we could fight for a full year...

Get access to TruthMed- how to save your family and friends that have been vaxx with vaccine detox, & how the Unvaxxed can prevent spike protein infection from the jabbed.

Free with ANR Subscription from $8

Download the Full PDF - THE COVID-19 FRAUD & WAR ON HUMANITY