Were ‘Leaky Vaxxines’ Deliberately Spread Round the World?

 128 total views

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on pinterest
Pinterest
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on telegram
Telegram

Were ‘Leaky Vaxxines’ Deliberately Spread Round the World?

By Elizabeth Hart

For the attention of:
Graham Brady
Chairman of the 1922 Committee
UK Conservative Party

Dear Graham Brady, it’s clear now that the covid-19 ‘vaccines’ are actually ‘leaky vaccines’ that don’t prevent infection nor transmission.

In the case of the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine, this was known from the beginning, when the monkey trial demonstrated that the vaccine did not prevent the animals from catching or spreading the virus.

What consideration was given to this matter before progressing to human trials?

This must be tracked back now, who decided to continue with the Oxford/AstraZeneca human trials, knowing that the monkeys could catch and spread the virus?

This was raised by Jonathan Ball, professor of molecular virology at the University of Nottingham in May 2020 when he said:

the vaccine data suggests that the jab may not be able to prevent the spread of the virus between infected individuals. “That viral loads in the noses of vaccinated and unvaccinated animals were identical is very significant. If the same happened in humans, vaccination would not stop spread,” he said. “I genuinely believe that this finding should warrant an urgent re-appraisal of the ongoing human trials of the ChAdOx1 vaccine.”

Graham Brady, I request that you initiate an urgent investigation into this matter.

The circulation of ‘leaky vaccines’ around the globe has interfered with the natural human response to the virus, and led to these medical interventions being repeatedly pressed upon billions of people. Some countries are now up to the fourth shot ‘booster’, e.g. with other products, such as the Pfizer and Moderna jabs, being used in conjunction with the Oxford/AstraZeneca jab.

In many instances people are being coerced to submit to these defective jabs, e.g. in Australia, where State governments and employers are mandating the covid jabs for employment – No Jab, No Job. Public venues such as theatres, sports stadiums and football and golf clubs etc are also insisting patrons be injected with these ‘leaky vaccines’.

This is an unprecedented medical intervention being undertaken across the global population, against a virus it was known from the beginning wasn’t a serious threat to most people. The world population is now in the throes of a massive experiment – without valid informed consent. We have no idea where this is going. Most recently the omicron variant is being promoted as the latest threat, another variant which appears to escape the ‘leaky vaccines’. The threat of omicron is being beaten up in countries such as the UK and Australia, despite the fact that the country where this variant first appeared, South Africa, reports it is generally mild, see: From symptoms to transmission – why we must listen to South African scientists on omicron, Telegraph, 9 January 2022, copy attached.

Graham Brady, some historical articles in the Telegraph provide background re the monkey trial. An article titled Exclusive: Oxford University Covid-19 vaccine trial has 50 per cent chance of ‘no result’, 23 May 2020, includes reference to the monkey trial conducted by Sarah Gilbert:

When Covid-19 began to spread, Prof Gilbert decided to do a “little lab project” to see whether the Oxford technique could work on the new disease. Tests were promising, and in April six rhesus macaque monkeys were given single doses of the Oxford vaccine at a US lab, and were then exposed to the virus. A month later, all six monkeys were still healthy. (My emphasis.)

But further in the article it emerges the vaccine didn’t prevent infection nor transmission:

Until last week, the Oxford vaccine was considered the clear frontrunner in the global race. Last week, however, a widely-reported article in Forbes cast doubt on the results of the monkey trial, suggesting that results actually showed the vaccine did not prevent the animals from catching or spreading the virus because traces were found in the creatures’ noses. (My emphasis.)

Prof Hill said the article was misleading because the monkeys had been deliberately “overdosed” on
coronavirus in order to test for safety.

“The honest truth, I think, is that the author is a long-retired senior Harvard virologist, infectious disease guy.
He’s not a vaccine developer,” he said.

“We used a really high dose and these guys gave it not just into the lungs and the nose. They gave it into the mouth, and they gave it into the eyes. They gave a huge dose. I mean, seriously, it’s that level of basic.”

Here’s the link to the Forbes article by William A Haseltine that cast doubt on the monkey trial: Did the Oxford covid vaccine work in monkeys? Not really. 16 May 2020.

In another article on the Telegraph, dated 18 May 2020: (See article attached – Doubts over Oxford vaccine as it fails to stop coronavirus in animal trials.)

Jonathan Ball, professor of molecular virology at the University of Nottingham, said the vaccine data suggests that the jab may not be able to prevent the spread of the virus between infected individuals.

“That viral loads in the noses of vaccinated and unvaccinated animals were identical is very significant. If the same happened in humans, vaccination would not stop spread,” he said. “I genuinely
believe that this finding should warrant an urgent re-appraisal of the ongoing human trials of the ChAdOx1 vaccine.”

And

Eleanor Riley, professor of Immunology and Infectious Disease at the University of Edinburgh, said there was both good and bad news in the most monkey trials:

“Whilst the vaccine induced neutralising antibodies and vaccinated animals experienced less severe clinical symptoms than unvaccinated animals (good), the neutralising antibody titres were low and insufficient to prevent infection and – importantly – insufficient to prevent viral shedding in nasal secretions (worrying).

“If similar results were obtained in humans, the vaccine would likely provide partial protection against disease in the vaccine recipient but would be unlikely to reduce transmission in the wider community.”

(My emphasis.)

Again, did that happen as Jonathan Ball suggested? Was there an urgent re-appraisal of the ongoing human trials of the ChAdOx1 vaccine at that time?

Graham Brady, this is important to consider now, as we know ‘the vaccines’ haven’t stopped infection or spread in the human population. These ‘leaky vaccines’ have been circulated around the world, with millions of people being coerced to have them repeatedly, trashing informed consent, and creating multi-billion dollar repeat covid jab markets.

This must be tracked back now.

I request your urgent response on this matter.

Sincerely
Elizabeth Hart
Independent person investigation the gross over-use of vaccine products and conflicts of interest in vaccination policy

 129 total views

*Note We Deliberately Miss Spell Some Words or Add Capital Letters To Get Around Big Tech Censoring.

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on pinterest
Pinterest
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on telegram
Telegram

Join www.truthbook.social our new social media platform backed by Independent Media. where you can speak the truth, and not be banned. Plus you'll receive $50 USD in www.truthcoin.social,the crypto currency backing the project, when you join, plus a lot more for sharing posts. www.truthbook.social

Truthbook.social offering hundreds of thousands in giveaways for those joining its new social media platform as many desert Facebook in droves because of censoring

Here is some of the current incentives being offered to new users

Subscribe for free to our ANR news emails and access 2 free ebooks plus Reports to share with family and friends about Covid fraud and the danger of the vaccines.

For ANR Smaller Donors please donate below to help fund our critical not for profit work. Together we can defeat mainstream media.

We are a not for profit Independent Media Company which survives off donations, even as little as $5 per month . Please donate now to help fund our work

Truthcoin Offer

$1000 USD turns into Now $7500 Truthcoin
$2,500 USD turns into Now $25,000 Truthcoin
$5000 USD turns into Now $65,000 Truthcoin
$10,000 USD turns into Now $150,000 Truthcoin
$15,000 USD turns into Now $250,000 Truthcoin
$50,000 USD turns into Now $1.15 Million Truthcoin
$100,000 USD turns into Now $2.5 Million Truthcoin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

McIntyre Report
Political Talk Show

We are a not for profit Independent Media Company which survives off donations, even as little as $5 per month . Please donate now to help fund our work

Kylie Bartlett show

Craig Schulze Show

WHY WE NEED TO START SAYING NO TO GAIN OUR SELF RESPECT

Play Video

Raw Report

Ryan Jackson Saw show

Hero Nurse Exposes Government Policies Leading to Elder Abuse

ANR Conversations With Wayne Crouch and Lisa Johnston With Special Guest Simeon Boikov A.K.A the Aussie Cossack

Top 10 Crypto

in USD

in AUD

in GBP

in CAD

Jamie McIntyre

Truthbook.Social

Currency Exchange Rates in AUD

Live and updated every minute of the day

Current Price of Bitcoin 2.0
0.19 on Coinsbit

Nurses Speak Out

ANR Meme Report

with Nadine Roberts

Episode 002

21st Century Political System

Play Video

Editor's Pick

Enter email to receive ANR News articles, 2 free e-books, plus the Global Health Organisation Report

Download the Full PDF - THE COVID-19 FRAUD & WAR ON HUMANITY