Will these 12 Top Scientists From the CETF SAB Do the Right Thing? I Seriously Doubt It

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on pinterest
Pinterest
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on telegram
Telegram

Where Ted Talks end, Truth Talks begin.
Defending democracy by defending free speech

Opinion pieces don’t necessarily reflect the position of our news site but of our Opinion writers.

Will these 12 Top Scientists From the CETF SAB Do the Right Thing? I Seriously Doubt It

By Steve Kirsch

They all resigned within days of my “Should you get vaccinated?” article that was published on TrialSiteNews on May 25, 2021. Today, I am calling for them to take at least one action listed below.

Executive Summary

The scientific advisory board of the COVID19 Early Treatment Fund all resigned shortly after I exposed the fact that the COVID vaccines were too unsafe to deploy.

Today, I am asking these scientists to step up to the plate and either admit they were wrong or defend their position in a public challenge.

What do you think they will do? I predict they will do absolutely nothing.

This is how science works today.

Introduction

Within days after I wrote a lengthy article on TrialSiteNews on May 25, 2021 entitled “Should you get vaccinated?” exposing the fact that the vaccines were too dangerous to deploy and explicitly calling out Tony Fauci as a very bad person, all the members of the Scientific Advisory Board of the COVID19 Early Treatment Fund resigned in protest.

I asked them, “If I got it wrong, please tell me what is wrong and I’ll fix it.”

None of them cited a single error! Instead, I was informed that I am an evil person and some explicitly said that I should never talk to them again.

The people on the SAB included:

  1. Robert Siliciano
  2. Judith Feinberg
  3. Carolyn Machamer
  4. Doug Richman
  5. Fred Hayden
  6. Maureen Horton
  7. Michael Ison
  8. Rajesh Gandhi
  9. Richard Thomas D’Aquila
  10. Richard Whitley
  11. Steve Desiderio
  12. Peter Meinke

Here’s an image of the CETF website from May 15, 2021 courtesy of the Wayback Machine (the 3 missing images are a Wayback Machine artifact):

Some of them choose to go the next step and trash me publicly as in this article published by MIT. For example, Dr. Feinberg was quoted:

“He may not be a good scientist, but he’s smart,” says WVU’s Feinberg. “He’s very convincing. He might be a good snake oil salesman.”

Wow. Care to debate that one publicly, Judith? Perhaps you’d be kind enough to answer at least one of my 125+ questions?

Of course I was right about early treatment, fluvoxamine, and the vaccine being too dangerous to use.

Regarding fluvoxamine, the math at the time showed the results were impossible if the drug didn’t work. For example, the long-haul COVID results in the Seftel real-world study published in OFID where not a single one of the 77 patients treated with fluvoxamine reported any long-haul COVID symptoms compared to 40% in the group that didn’t get the fluvoxamine. That cannot happen by chance. Not a single member of the SAB offered a credible explanation for how that could happen if the drug didn’t work. Neither could anyone else. That’s why I said it should be used.

In addition, the Phase 3 trials (the Together Trial) also proved I was right.

Did I get an apology? Nope.

These scientists should take at least one action from the list below

Now that that it’s crystal clear I was telling the truth about the COVID vaccines, I am requesting each of them do one of three things:
  1. Issue a public statement denouncing the COVID vaccines as being unsafe and recommending that it be immediately stopped worldwide.
  2. Choose 1 or more topics from this list of over 125 questions and discuss it with my colleagues listed in that article in a public forum so we can expose the truth.
  3. Publicly agree or disagree with this op-ed co-authored by UCSF Professor Vinay Prasad which said that scientists who disagree should be heard, not demonized.

They should pick at least one option above. To not do any of these things would, in my opinion, be a tacit endorsement of the censorship of scientific disagreement and be “anti-science.”

Opinion pieces don’t necessarily reflect the position of our news site but of our Opinion writers.

*Note We Deliberately Miss Spell Some Words or Add Capital Letters To Get Around Big Tech Censoring.

Support the ANR from as little as $8 – it only takes a minute. If you can, please consider supporting us with a regular amount each month. Thank you.

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on pinterest
Pinterest
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on telegram
Telegram

Related News

Where Ted Talks end, Truth Talks begin.
Defending democracy by defending free speech

Subscribe for free to our ANR news emails and access 2 free ebooks plus Reports to share with family and friends about Covid fraud and the danger of the vaccines.

Help us help defend free speech and save democracy from the World Economic Forum planned Totalitarian Great Reset.

and help us expose the Covid Fraudsters

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Documentary: Died Suddenly (2022)

Play Video

McIntyre Report
Political Talk Show

Episode 157

Episode 157

How you can advertise on Truthbook.social

Help us help defend free speech and save democracy from the World Economic Forum planned Totalitarian Great Reset.

and help us expose the Covid Fraudsters

Ukraine. Military Summary And Analysis 23.01.2023

Raw Report

Ryan Jackson Saw show

in USD

in AUD

in GBP

in CAD

Jamie McIntyre

ANR on

Currency Exchange Rates in AUD

Live and updated every minute of the day

Nurses Speak Out

Get our free News Emails on latest articles, alerts and solutions for both legal templates and ways to help fight back against the Globalists vax Mandates , and health resources to boost your immune system and ways to Protect from deadly EMF 5G radiation and more.

FREE E-BOOKS AND REPORTS ALSO

ANR Meme Report

with Nadine Roberts

Episode 002

21st Century Political System

Play Video

Editor's Pick

Thank you for visiting the
Australian National Review

To continue accessing more articles for free simply enter your email address

Watch Full Documentary

Download the Full PDF - THE COVID-19 FRAUD & WAR ON HUMANITY