Prominent legal scholar Alan Dershowitz recently appeared on Newsmax with host Greta Van Susteren to analyze the controversial Hunter Biden plea deal. Dershowitz wasted no time in dissecting the deal, asserting that the presiding judge astutely “smelled a rat.” He insinuated that Hunter’s defense team deliberately concealed certain aspects of the agreement because they knew it would not be viewed as reasonable.
Dershowitz shared a tactic he had often employed throughout his career, wherein he would approach the prosecutor in a case he was defending and present compelling reasons why they would not succeed, with the intention of pressuring the prosecutor into making a more favorable deal. However, in Hunter Biden’s case, Dershowitz contended that there was nothing to dissuade the prosecutor from pursuing a robust prosecution. The firearms charges were seemingly airtight, supported by indisputable evidence, while the tax charges had essentially been admitted. Therefore, with no leverage to negotiate, it seemed peculiar that Hunter was granted apparent total immunity.
The renowned legal expert went on to explain what he believed had transpired behind the scenes. According to Dershowitz, there was an oral agreement—a handshake deal—made between Hunter’s defense lawyers and the prosecution, assuring Hunter that he would not face prosecution. However, this understanding was intentionally omitted from the written agreement to avoid the appearance of an overly favorable arrangement. Unfortunately for Hunter, his defense team made a critical error by publicly boasting about the deal, thereby alerting the Justice Department to the existence of this blanket immunity. It was this revelation that ultimately raised suspicions and caught the attention of the judge overseeing the case.
In light of this analysis, it becomes clear that the intentions behind the plea deal were dubious. It appears that Hunter Biden, being part of the privileged elite, was seeking preferential treatment. The deal’s secrecy and subsequent publicity brought attention to the potential inequity of the arrangement. Dershowitz’s astute observations highlight the importance of preserving blind justice, where individuals are prosecuted based on their actions rather than their stature.
In conclusion, Alan Dershowitz’s insightful analysis of the Hunter Biden plea deal reveals a concerning attempt to grant the former vice president’s son special treatment. His quick dissection of the deal raised questions about its fairness, and the subsequent exposure of its potential favorable treatment brought the issue to the forefront. With Dershowitz’s expertise shedding light on the matter, it becomes imperative to reflect upon the need to uphold impartiality within our justice system.
Source link
