Letter to the Editor
In the midst of The Voice debate, I propose a singing lesson to keep the topic on track. Let’s begin with our National Anthem’s latest version, which starts with the lyrics: “Australians let us all rejoice, for we are one and free…” It does not continue, “One rule for you, another rule for me…”
Let’s also remember the chorus of “I am Australian,” made famous by Judith Durham and The Seekers decades ago: “We are one, but we are many, And from all the lands on earth we come. We share a dream and sing with one voice: I am, you are, we are Australian…”
These songs encapsulate the spirit of unity and inclusivity that we strive for as a nation. However, the recent push for a Voice enshrined in the Constitution threatens to create division based on race.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Indigenous Affairs Minister Linda Burney argue that The Voice Referendum is a positive proposal to establish an advisory body. They deny any connection to Treaty, Reparations, or “Truth Telling,” despite the fact that they have already initiated discussions on a “Makaratta Commission.” Makaratta directly translates to treaty, and the Uluru Statement from the Heart, which the Prime Minister has pledged to implement in full, clearly advocates for Treaty and Reparations.
Instead of relying solely on a permanent Voice in the Constitution, we should question why the numerous State and Federal indigenous agencies, which have received substantial funding over the years, haven’t been able to address the issues facing indigenous communities.
A Productivity Commission report states that the total direct expenditure on services for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians in 2012-13 was estimated to be $30.3 billion. However, it remains unclear where all this funding has gone and why it hasn’t reached the outback communities in most need. Additionally, the 2021 Census revealed that the number of people identifying as Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander origin has increased by 25% since 2016. This trend highlights the need for effective intervention and accountability.
If the Yes vote succeeds in implementing a Voice in the Constitution, there is a concern that the influx of “box tickers” will strain government resources, unless appropriate checks and balances are in place to prevent abuse of funds.
It is crucial to consider alternative approaches that address the root causes of inequality and disadvantage faced by indigenous communities. This includes implementing effective policies, ensuring transparency in funding allocation, and fostering community-led solutions.
We must remember that our goal is to create a united and inclusive Australia, where all voices are heard and respected. This can be achieved by focusing on genuine reconciliation, understanding, and collaboration, rather than divisive measures that potentially perpetuate inequality.
Sincerely,
John Mikkelsen
Noosa
Source link
