In a recent address, Aboriginal Minister Linda Burney highlighted the lack of representation and voice that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians have had under the Australian constitution. Burney expressed her concern in Parliament, stating that these communities have had no say in matters that directly affect them.
However, this statement has been met with criticism and accusations of misinformation. One critic, known as Koolymoot from Kurdaitcha, dismissed Burney’s claim as “baloney.” He argued that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians are already adequately represented in the government and have a significant voice in law and policy-making.
Indeed, there are currently 11 Indigenous MPs in Canberra, representing 4.84 percent of the 227 parliamentarians. This is a higher proportion than their 3.2 percent share of the population. This overrepresentation in parliament suggests that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians are already well-represented.
Furthermore, there are 3,273 registered Aboriginal Corporations actively advocating for the rights and needs of Indigenous communities. These organizations make regular representations to the government to ensure the delivery of essential services like healthcare.
Additionally, the National Indigenous Australian Agency (NIAA) plays a crucial role in policy development, implementation, and service delivery for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. With 1,317 employees and a budget close to 4.5 billion dollars this financial year, the NIAA represents the voice of these communities at the federal level.
Financially, Indigenous people and communities receive over $34 billion annually, with hundreds of millions of dollars coming from mining royalties alone. In the Northern Territory (NT) alone, Aboriginal organizations receive more than 230 million dollars per year. This significant funding demonstrates that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities have substantial financial resources to address their specific needs.
Given these facts, critics argue that Burney’s claim of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians having no voice or representation is misleading. They suggest that these communities are already overrepresented and receive a substantial amount of funding to address their needs.
Critics also argue that the push for the Indigenous Voice to Parliament appears hypocritical. They believe that like all other Australians, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have achieved their current standing in life based on their abilities. The emphasis should be on equal opportunities and merit rather than creating separate bodies for specific groups.
In conclusion, the claim made by Linda Burney regarding the lack of voice and representation for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians has been met with criticism. Critics argue that these communities are already well-represented in government, receive significant funding, and have various organizations advocating for their needs. They believe that the focus should be on equal opportunities for all Australians, regardless of their background, rather than creating separate bodies.
Source link
