Title: China’s Property Market Faces Major Challenges and Economic Realities
The Chinese property market is experiencing significant turmoil as the bonds and shares of Country Garden Holdings, the largest property developer in the country, have crashed. Country Garden’s dollar-denominated bonds, maturing in January 2024, are now trading at only 25% of their notional value, compared to 81% in mid-June. Additionally, contracted sales for the top 100 developers in China fell by 33% in July compared to the previous year. These challenges, coupled with the government’s limited intervention, are undermining the assumption that housing prices will continue to rise indefinitely.
China’s housing market has long been driven by speculative demand, with investors purchasing second and third homes that often remain unrented. This demand has helped mask the country’s weak demographics. However, the prolonged downturn and the government’s more hands-off approach have eroded confidence in the market. Goldman Sachs predicts that China’s urban housing demand will decrease to 11 million units in 2022, significantly lower than the 18 million units in 2017. Additionally, Chinese developers currently have approximately $9 trillion worth of inventories, including unfinished projects and raw land. This inventory is equivalent to about 4.8 years of estimated contracted sales for this year.
The debate around China’s GDP compared to the United States has also resurfaced, with some arguing that China surpassed the US several years ago in terms of Purchasing Power Parity (PPP). However, this measure has its limitations, particularly for countries like China that manipulate debt levels and calculate GDP differently. Adjusting GDP for purchasing power is fraught with problems, as economists struggle to find a consistent and reliable way to do so.
Moreover, China’s property bubble sets it apart from the rest of the world. The country has numerous vacant malls, airports, and even entire cities. State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) are insolvent, creating a significant financial burden. Additionally, China’s overdependence on exports and its heavy reliance on energy imports put its economy at risk, especially given the environmental damage caused by coal use.
A noteworthy factor in China’s property market is the issue of payments and mortgage financing. While in the US, mortgages are granted when houses are complete, in China, real estate firms sell homes before they are finished. Buyers make mortgage payments even before taking possession of the property, and these payments are used to finance construction. This practice has led to cases where developers have produced no physical property, which only further exacerbates the risks in the market.
The narrative that China has overtaken the US in terms of GDP is also challenged by the stark differences in the standard of living and economic systems. It is widely recognized that the average standard of living in China is far below that of the US. Communist policies, which govern China’s economy, have limitations and inefficiencies that hinder its long-term growth prospects.
In conclusion, China’s property market is facing significant challenges, and the country’s GDP comparisons with the US are subject to debate. The impact of the property bubble, coupled with economic realities and different calculation methods, casts doubt on China’s claims to have surpassed the US in GDP. As the market continues to struggle and the government’s interventions yield limited results, the Chinese property sector remains a cause for concern.
Source link