December 11, 2023 9:06 pm

Feds will appeal court ruling that overturned single-use plastic ban, says Guilbeault

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
WhatsApp
Telegram

URGENT: JUST 11 DAYS REMAIN TO HELP SAVE INDEPENDENT MEDIA & ANR, TO ENSURE WE ARE FULLY FUNDED FOR NEXT MONTH,SO LET'S CUT THE BS & GET TO THE POINT - WE WILL BE FORCED LAY OFF STAFF & REDUCE OPERATIONS UNLESS WE ARE FULLY FUNDED WITHIN THE NEXT 2 WEEKS - Sadly, less than 0.5% of readers currently donate or subscribe to us But YOU can easily change that. Imagine the impact we'd make if 3 in 10 readers supported us today. To start with we’d remove this annoying banner as we could fight for a full year...



























The government will appeal a federal court ruling which undermined the Cabinet order responsible for Canada’s ban on single-use plastics, Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault announced on Monday.

Federal judge Angela Furlanetto ruled last Thursday that Guilbeault’s order labelling all plastic products as toxic was both unreasonable and unconstitutional. Furlanetto said that Ottawa had gone too far in labelling all plastic manufactured items as toxic under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act. 

In his immediate reaction Thursday night, Guilbeault had said that the government was “strongly considering” an appeal. 

The judge’s decision said that there is no evidence that the thousands of different items in that category all harm human health or the environment, given their different uses and chemical compositions. 

However, the ruling itself did not ‘undo’ the ban on the manufacturing and importation of six specific single-use plastics that Canadians might be most familiar with, including stir sticks, straws, grocery bags, cutlery, takeout containers and six-pack beverage rings.

The designation of toxicity was required for the government to regulate plastic products. Guilbeault said he’s determined to make sure the government does not have to roll back the federal regulations. “The body of scientific evidence showing the impacts on human health, on the environment, of plastic pollution is undebatable,” he said.

Furlanetto’s decision leaves room for the government to designate the individual items as toxic, rather than all plastic manufactured items. Guilbeault had argued that those six items were chosen because they already have market alternatives and are among the most common items. According to Global News, they represent 3% of plastic waste.

The Liberals say their aim is to eliminate plastic waste by 2030, taking items that are difficult to recycle out of circulation while ensuring the rest are recyclable or reusable. 

The existing ban on manufacturing most items impacted went into effect in December 2022, with a ban on sales set to take effect next month. A ban on manufacturing six-pack rings took place in June with their sale to be prohibited by June 2024.

The challenge to Guilbeault’s ‘toxic’ designation came on behalf of the Responsible Plastic Use Coalition, a group that represents plastics companies and chemical companies that produce the materials. The coalition said it supported the judge’s decision.

“In the interest of Canadians who rely on plastic products that are essential to everyday life, we believe that the federal government and industry can work collaboratively to reduce plastic waste,” it said in a statement.

Municipal and provincial regulations that ban plastic, including in Prince Edward Island and British Columbia, will not be impacted by the federal ruling. 



Source link

Opinion pieces don’t necessarily reflect the position of our news site but of our Opinion writers.

Original Source: Feds will appeal court ruling that overturned single-use plastic ban, says Guilbeault

Support the ANR from as little as $8 – it only takes a minute. If you can, please consider supporting us with a regular amount each month. Thank you.

Related News

Subscribe for free to our ANR news emails and access 2 free ebooks plus Reports to share with family and friends about Covid fraud and the danger of the vaccines.

Australian National Review is Australia’s first real free and independent press, one with no editorial control by the elite, but a publication that can generate critical thinkers and critical debate and hold those spreading mistruths and deliberate propaganda in mainstream media to account.

News with a difference that will be educational, compelling and create a platform for political and social change in this country and address the real issues facing this country and the world.

Watch Full Documentary

URGENT: JUST 3 DAYS REMAIN TO HELP SAVE INDEPENDENT MEDIA & ANR, SO LET'S CUT THE BS & GET TO THE POINT - WE WILL BE FORCED TO LAY OFF STAFF & REDUCE OPERATIONS UNLESS WE ARE FULLY FUNDED WITHIN THE NEXT 2 WEEKS

Sadly, less than 0.5% of readers currently donate or subscribe to us But YOU can easily change that. Imagine the impact we'd make if 3 in 10 readers supported us today. To start with we’d remove this annoying banner as we could fight for a full year...

Get access to TruthMed- how to save your family and friends that have been vaxx with vaccine detox, & how the Unvaxxed can prevent spike protein infection from the jabbed.

Free with ANR Subscription from $8

Download the Full PDF - THE COVID-19 FRAUD & WAR ON HUMANITY