During her National Press Club speech, Indigenous Australians Minister Linda Burney addressed the issue of the Voice and criticized the tactics employed by the opposition. She accused the leader of the opposition, Peter Dutton, of using “bully boy tactics” and importing “Trump style politics” into Australia. Burney emphasized that the ‘No’ campaign was spreading falsehoods and aimed to polarize society. She stated, “It is post-truth and its aim is to polarise, to sow division in our society by making false claims, including [that] providing advice to government would somehow impact the fundamental democratic principle of one vote, one value.” Burney urged Australians not to allow the ‘No’ campaign to divide them further.
Additionally, Burney raised concerns about the potential impact of the debate on the mental health of Indigenous people. She stated, “We are very conscious of the issues around mental health and just where this debate could go. We’ve already seen some fairly unsavoury things.” Despite these allegations, Burney asserted that she would maintain a positive and respectful approach throughout the discourse.
Burney argued that the Voice was necessary because previous efforts to “close the gap” on Indigenous disadvantage had not been successful. She proposed that the Voice would operate independently from the government but would be tasked with providing insights and ideas on matters related to housing, health, education, and employment.
In response, Peter Dutton acknowledged Burney’s intention to support Indigenous Australians but questioned whether the Voice was the most effective means to achieve that goal. Dutton emphasized the importance of considering alternative approaches.
Burney, on the other hand, maintained that there was nothing to fear in the proposed Voice and that it could bring about positive change. She highlighted the importance of addressing Indigenous disadvantage and stated that the Voice would play a crucial role in addressing issues related to housing, health, education, and employment.
The debate surrounding the Voice and its potential impact on Indigenous Australians continues. Both sides recognize the importance of addressing Aboriginal disadvantage but differ in their views on the most effective approach. The outcome of this ongoing discussion will shape the future of Indigenous policy and determine the extent to which the Voice becomes a reality in Australia.
Source link
