An Investigation into Corrupt Voter Registration Practices
The issue of fraudulent voter registrations has been a topic of concern for many Americans. The left and corrupt “Muskegon” type organizations have been accused of inflating voter rolls with certain names that appear to be from real residents. This article sheds light on the methods used by these organizations and the potential violations of privacy and election laws.
One of the main sources of names for bulk voter registrations is the State’s Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) database. Almost every person aged 16 and above interacts with their State’s DMV/MVD in one way or another. Whether it’s registering a new vehicle, obtaining a driver’s license, or updating personal information, the DMV database contains a comprehensive list of voting age residents.
To identify potential voters who are not registered, these organizations subtract the names already registered to vote from the names in the DMV database. This practice has led to concerns about the accuracy and integrity of the voter rolls. Critics argue that the push for online voter registration and driver’s licenses for illegal aliens is a ploy to collect more names of potential voters, particularly those in low-income and marginalized communities.
To further their agenda, these organizations created a non-profit called ERIC (Electronic Registration Information Center) and pitched it to various States. States that join ERIC pay an annual membership fee and are required to provide their private DMV data to ERIC every 60 days. The issue here is that no other entity, including political parties and campaigns, has access to DMV data like ERIC does.
Although some States have recently pulled out of ERIC, over 20 States continue to provide DMV data to the organization. The secretive nature of ERIC and its refusal to provide transparency on the lists of eligible-but-unregistered (EBU) voters it creates has raised concerns about potential violations of privacy laws. The Federal Drivers Privacy Protection Act (DPPA) was enacted to protect the privacy of individuals’ information obtained by DMV offices across the country. ERIC’s access to DMV data without explicit consent may be in violation of this law.
Legal teams are currently analyzing ERIC’s practices to determine if they violate the DPPA. If violations are proven, individuals can seek damages and attorney’s fees through civil lawsuits, and regulatory authorities can impose civil penalties. Limiting ERIC’s access to DMV data would also help level the playing field in elections.
Despite claiming to be an effective voter registration drive, ERIC has faced criticism for its lack of focus on cleaning voter rolls. ERIC provides reports that can be used to identify and remove ineligible voters, but many States rarely request these reports after joining ERIC. Instead, their primary focus seems to be pumping private DMV data to ERIC, raising further suspicions about their true intentions.
Two examples mentioned in the article highlight these concerns. Wisconsin initially requested only three cleaning reports in their first five years with ERIC but regularly sent their entire DMV dataset to ERIC. In another case, Georgia joined ERIC shortly after Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger took office. Jordan Fuchs, who was later revealed to have secretly recorded a phone call with President Trump and lied to the media, served on the ERIC Board for Georgia.
These revelations raise questions about the integrity of the voter registration process and the need for greater transparency and accountability. A high-profile legal organization is currently investigating ERIC and is in need of financial assistance to proceed with a targeted lawsuit against the organization.
In conclusion, the left and corrupt organizations have allegedly been using the State’s DMV database to inflate voter rolls with certain names. The creation of ERIC and its access to DMV data without explicit consent has raised concerns about potential violations of privacy and election laws. The focus on collecting data rather than cleaning voter rolls has further fueled suspicions about the true intentions of these organizations. The need for transparency, accountability, and adherence to privacy and election laws is paramount to ensure the integrity of our democratic process.
Source link
