Last Updated on August 5, 2023
Jack Smith is attempting to issue a silencing protective order against Donald Trump following Trump’s Friday night Truth Social post. It should be noted that this post was about the globalist PAC Club for Growth, not Jack Smith. Smith’s attempt to restrict Trump’s free speech raises questions about his intentions and the potential infringement on the First Amendment.
Before heading to Alabama for a high-energy speech, Trump took to Truth Social to write, “If you go after me, I am coming after you.” This statement drew attention from Jack Smith, who then tried to issue a protective order against Trump. The order emphasizes the importance of restrictions in this case, citing Trump’s previous public statements on social media regarding individuals involved with legal matters. It also references specific posts made by Trump in relation to this case.
In response, the Trump campaign released a statement clarifying that Trump’s Truth post was actually referring to the globalist PAC Club for Growth and had nothing to do with Jack Smith. The statement stressed that Trump’s post was protected political speech and aimed at criticizing certain special interest groups and Super PACs.
Jack Smith’s attempt to limit Donald Trump’s free speech is based on a falsehood. Smith’s J6 case against Trump has already been viewed by some as an attack on the First Amendment, and this recent move further reinforces that perception. It raises questions about Smith’s motivations and whether or not he genuinely believes Trump’s post was directed at him.
Furthermore, it is worth noting that the Biden White House, along with Smith, may have witnessed the huge crowd that Trump drew in Alabama on Friday night. This observation could be a factor in the motivation behind limiting Trump’s speech. It is possible that the Biden White House sees restricting Trump’s speech as a means to achieve their goal of preventing his reelection.
Additionally, it is evident that globalist forces are resorting to lies and censorship in an attempt to undermine Trump’s influence. They may feel that they cannot defeat him with facts and truth alone, prompting them to employ such tactics. This raises concerns about the integrity of free speech and the ability to engage in open political discourse.
In conclusion, Jack Smith’s attempt to issue a silencing protective order against Donald Trump based on a misinterpretation of Trump’s Truth Social post raises concerns about the infringement of free speech and the potential political motivations behind it. This incident highlights the ongoing battle between those who seek to restrict speech and those who value the principles of the First Amendment. It also underscores the lengths to which some individuals and groups may go in order to silence their political opponents.