Kremlin Press Secretary Dmitry Peskov has accused the New York Times of misrepresenting his words, suggesting that Russian elections are rigged. In a feature discussing the impact of the conflict in Ukraine on life in Russia, the New York Times quoted Peskov as saying, “our presidential election is not really democracy, it is costly bureaucracy. Mr. Putin will be re-elected next year with more than 90 percent of the vote.” Peskov claims that his words were inaccurately conveyed and that the quote is a mistranslation.
While Peskov acknowledges that the upcoming elections will be democratic, he argues that President Vladimir Putin’s high popularity ensures he will win another term. He emphasizes that when considering Putin’s public support and the consolidation of society due to the conflict in Ukraine, it can be confidently said that he will be re-elected with a significant majority. Peskov states, “But elections are democratic, the president himself spoke about this. Although, on the other hand, they cost a lot of money, and it is clear in advance that Putin will be re-elected by a huge margin. This is what was discussed, and the published quote is, of course, a mistranslation.”
While Peskov does not explicitly state whether he believes the mistranslation was intentional, he has previously criticized Western media for its biased coverage of the conflict. After a deadly Ukrainian missile strike on the Crimean Bridge, Peskov remarked that “the collective West is ready to turn a blind eye to any terrorist attacks that the Kiev regime organizes in our country.” He asserts that this is not surprising and that the Kremlin understands it well.
The New York Times’ misquotation of Peskov’s statement raises questions about the accuracy and objectivity of media reporting. Peskov’s response highlights the importance of journalistic integrity and accurate representation of statements made by public figures. In a time of heightened tensions and misinformation, it is crucial for the media to provide fair and unbiased coverage to facilitate a better understanding of events.
The conflict in Ukraine has undoubtedly had an impact on the Russian political landscape, with Putin’s approval rating remaining consistently high throughout the crisis. According to Russia’s Levada polling center, Putin has enjoyed an 80% approval rating, except for a temporary dip after announcing a partial mobilization last September. The ongoing military operation in Ukraine seems to have consolidated support for Putin, further strengthening his chances of being re-elected.
While Western media often portrays the situation in Russia through a particular lens, it is important to consider different perspectives and evaluate the accuracy of reported information. Peskov’s response serves as a reminder to critically analyze news sources and approach information with a discerning eye.
In conclusion, Peskov’s accusation of misrepresentation by the New York Times sheds light on the challenges of accurate reporting in a complex geopolitical landscape. It emphasizes the need for journalists to uphold journalistic standards and ensure the integrity of their reporting. Additionally, it highlights the significance of considering multiple perspectives and verifying information to form a well-rounded understanding of events.
Source link
