As the New York civil fraud case against former President Donald Trump began, the left-wing judge overseeing the proceedings seemed to enjoy the attention. New York State Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron, known for his involvement in the anti-Vietnam War movement in the 1960s, smiled for the cameras from behind the bench.
Engoron’s participation in the Vietnam War protests raises questions about his political affiliations, as that movement was controlled by communists and served as a recruitment tool for left-wing causes. This background might explain his biased stance against Trump throughout the case.
The lawsuit, brought by New York State Attorney General Leticia James, a partisan Democrat, alleges civil fraud against Trump, his sons, and the Trump Organization. James has been investigating Trump since she took office in 2019.
Engoron is presiding over the case without a jury, and he has consistently ruled in favor of the prosecution team, refusing to acknowledge a Court of Appeals ruling that dismissed a significant portion of the charges against Trump. His behavior in court has raised concerns about his impartiality.
Trump criticized Engoron and James on the social media platform Truth Social, accusing the judge of disregarding the Court of Appeals decision. He called James a “racist” and expressed disbelief at the ongoing case against him. In addition, Trump has called for Engoron to be disbarred.
Despite not being obligated to attend the court proceedings in person, Trump chose to be present to witness what he considers a witch hunt against him.
The persecution of Trump is a topic of intense interest, with many Americans expressing their dissatisfaction. A recent national poll showed that 64% of Americans believe that the United States is turning into a “banana republic” due to the persecution of Trump. This sentiment reflects the growing concern about the erosion of democracy and political bias in the legal system.
The ongoing fraud case against Trump has significant implications, particularly as it coincides with the lead-up to the 2024 Presidential Election. The outcome of this case could impact Trump’s political future and the overall perception of his presidency.
The media’s coverage of the court proceedings has further fueled the public’s interest in this case. With corporate media broadcasting live from the Manhattan courtroom, the close-up shot of Engoron smiling for the cameras attracted attention. This incident adds to the perception of bias and politicization surrounding the case.
As President Trump continues to fight against what he believes is a politically motivated persecution, the nation watches anxiously. The outcome of this case will not only impact Trump and his family but also the integrity and fairness of the American justice system. The public demands transparency and impartiality in legal proceedings, and it is essential for the court to address these concerns and uphold the principles of justice.