Rewritten article:
An extract from a Communist Party of Australia document obtained by Geoff McDonald reveals a plan to create a separate Aboriginal state, potentially encompassing the entire country. The issue was brought to light in a debate on the Voice on ABC TV’s Q&A program, led by Patricia Karvelas, and featured filmmaker Rachel Perkins, who is of German and Irish descent and the daughter of Aboriginal activist Charlie Perkins.
Perkins argued that the purpose of the Voice is not about discrimination, despite the presence of race-based elements in the Constitution. She emphasized the need to recognize the deep connection to the land that Aboriginal Australians have developed over 65,000 years and advocated for this recognition to be included in the country’s highest legal document. However, her claim that the Voice is not about discrimination is contradictory considering that non-Aboriginal Australians are excluded from participating in the Voice.
The article questions the notion of a “deep connection to the land” and argues that Aboriginal Australians may not have any more connection to the country than white farmers working in rural areas. The author also highlights the inconsistency in estimations of the time Aboriginal Australians have been on the continent. While it is suggested that Aboriginal Australians have been in Australia for 65,000 years, it is argued that these estimations are speculative and used to portray them as a superior race.
The article also criticizes Perkins’s distortion of history in her filmmaking, which it claims promotes anti-colonialist sentiments and hatred of “colonialists.” It suggests that Perkins is part of a global movement, encouraged by the United Nations and Marxist activists like Antonio Guterres, which seeks to undermine Anglo-American nations.
The article then delves into the historical context of Aboriginal land rights movements. Geoff McDonald, a former member of the Communist Party of Australia, explains that the Aboriginal land rights movement originated from a paper written by Stalin at Lenin’s request. McDonald recalls his shock at seeing former party members speaking on behalf of Aboriginal Australians and the negative consequences that followed the removal of police from settlements in the Northern Territory.
Furthermore, the article questions the label of “truth-telling” used by indigenous activists to describe their version of history. It argues that while there were conflicts between settlers and Aboriginal Australians, characterizing it as a “war of resistance” oversimplifies the complex interactions that took place. It instead suggests that the British colonists claimed the lands due to their advanced technology and societal organization, and that the impacts of colonization were not solely negative, as many Aboriginal Australians adapted and made significant contributions to national life.
In conclusion, the rewritten article highlights various arguments challenging the narrative put forward by Rachel Perkins and indigenous activists. It raises doubts about the motives behind the push for a separate Aboriginal state and questions the accuracy of historical claims made by some proponents of indigenous rights.
Source link
