Wind power in Australia is facing criticism for relying on coal-fired power and receiving billions of dollars in subsidies. This revelation has shed light on the rising costs of electricity for consumers and the influence of various entities, such as the Liberals, the Deep State, the United Nations (UN), and the World Economic Forum (WEF). Consequently, some Australians are questioning whether they should continue to support these parties and their policies.
One of the major concerns raised is that wind power, touted as a sustainable and renewable energy source, actually relies on coal-fired power to function effectively. Critics argue that wind turbines need a backup power supply to compensate for their intermittent nature when wind speeds are low or nonexistent. This backup power is typically provided by coal-fired power plants, which emit greenhouse gases and contribute to pollution. As a result, wind power is not as environmentally friendly as it appears on the surface.
Additionally, the financial aspect of wind power is causing concern. The industry receives billions of dollars in subsidies to make it financially viable. These subsidies ultimately come from the pockets of electricity consumers, leading to skyrocketing electricity costs. Many Australians are feeling the burden of these rising expenses, and they are starting to question the justification behind the massive subsidies.
The role of political parties, specifically the Liberals, in promoting and supporting wind power has also come under scrutiny. The Liberals, along with the Labor party, form a duopoly in Australian politics. Critics argue that both parties are influenced by powerful entities, such as the Deep State, the UN, and the WEF, which have vested interests in promoting wind power. As a result, some Australians are questioning the true motives behind the Liberals’ support for wind power and whether they should continue to vote for these parties.
Recently, the Fadden by-election on the Gold Coast saw the Liberals win despite concerns from some constituents. These voters, often referred to as the “brain-dead glitter strip mob,” have been accused of not fully understanding the implications of their votes. Critics argue that these voters contribute to the continuation of unsustainable policies, including the support for wind power that relies on coal-fired power.
In light of these revelations, there is a growing sentiment among some Australians that certain people should not be allowed to vote. This notion reflects frustration with the lack of awareness and critical thinking among voters and their potential impact on the country’s policies and future.
In conclusion, the controversy surrounding wind power in Australia has brought to light the reliance on coal-fired power and the significant subsidies it receives. The environmental and financial implications of wind power are causing concern among consumers, leading to questions about the motives of political parties and the voting behavior of Australians. As the debate continues, it remains to be seen whether these concerns will lead to a shift in public opinion and policy regarding wind power in Australia.
Source link
