An Interview with a BC Woman Standing Up Against Radical Ideology in Schools
In a recent interview, a woman from British Columbia, Canada, spoke out against the use of gender-confusing language and ambiguous terms in sexual education programs. The woman, who prefers to remain anonymous, received an email from the Island Sexual Health Society informing her that her children would be participating in a “sexual health and relationships” presentation at their school. This email raised concerns for her about the language being used to teach children about human anatomy.
Of particular concern to the woman, referred to as Bates, was the use of “gender-inclusive language” during these presentations. Instead of clearly explaining the biological differences between males and females, the presentations would use terms like “a person with outside genitals” to describe the reproductive systems. Bates, a mother and former doula with 20 years of experience, was shocked by the inclusion of anti-scientific and exclusive terms in a public school setting.
Bates took to social media to express her concerns, sharing a screenshot of the email without disclosing any personal information about the school or its students. In her post, Bates wrote about the historical progress made in recognizing all aspects of a woman’s genitalia, emphasizing the importance of accurately teaching biology to children. She urged for a more logical and inclusive approach to sexual education, where both men and women have external genitalia.
Weeks later, Bates received an email from the Island Sexual Health Society requesting her to remove her post, accusing her of breaching privacy by sharing the school’s communications publicly. The society’s Coordinator of Education Services, Jennifer Gibson, stated that the email had been private correspondence between the school and class parents and that Bates did not have permission to share it. The society requested that Bates remove her post to address the alleged privacy breach.
Island Sexual Health Society, an organization that evolved from Planned Parenthood, offers sexual health care, “affirming” workshops, and youth training. The society claims to fully support SOGI (Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity) inclusive education initiatives. These initiatives include sexual education resources that feature sexually explicit images and explicit descriptions of sexual acts, which some parents find concerning.
Bates reached out to Island Sexual Health for clarification on the law she was accused of breaching but received no response. Rebel News, a news outlet, also contacted the society for comment but received no reply. The concerns raised by this woman highlight the ongoing debates surrounding gender-inclusive language, ambiguous terms, and the inclusion of explicit content in sexual education programs.
Efforts to protect children from radical ideologies and sexualization in schools should be a priority, and concerned parents should have the right to voice their concerns. To address this issue, a campaign has been launched urging individuals to send emails to the Ministers of Education of Canada’s provinces and territories, demanding their intervention to protect children from radical woke ideology, sexualization, and grooming. Individuals can fill out a form on a dedicated website to send an email directly to the Ministers of Education.
If you support the efforts of Rebel News to expose and address the sexual indoctrination of children in taxpayer-funded facilities, you can donate to help cover their costs and access more reports on this topic at StopClassroomGrooming.com.
In conclusion, the concerns raised by Bates and the ongoing debate about gender-inclusive language and sexual education highlight the importance of ensuring that children receive accurate and age-appropriate information in schools. The ability of parents to voice their concerns and hold educational institutions accountable is essential in shaping policies and practices that prioritize the well-being and protection of children.
Source link
