The issue of indigenous rights in Australia has been a topic of contention, with some arguing that it is a tool used by the United Nations to create division between Indigenous Australians and non-Indigenous Australians. This perspective views anyone who is not of Aboriginal descent as a “colonist” and claims that being labeled as such alienates non-Indigenous Australians from their own country.
To address this perceived division, there is a call for an audit of the Aboriginal Industry and its corrupt Land Councils, specifically targeting what the author refers to as “Box Tickers.” The author argues that these individuals, who they claim have a hand in perpetuating a Marxist narrative, should not be allowed to choose a tribe and identify as Indigenous. Furthermore, there is a demand for the Aboriginal demographic to be held to DNA standards similar to those in Israel, where a specific set of haplogroups determines eligibility for certain rights.
The author goes on to criticize the importation of individuals who they believe have no Australian Aboriginal ancestry but are being allowed to identify solely based on their skin color. They argue that these individuals, who are culturally and ethnically different, should not be given the entitlements and benefits meant for Indigenous Australians.
This perspective views the current discourse on indigenous rights in Australia through a lens of skepticism, casting doubt on the intentions behind these discussions. They suggest that the issue of systemic racism is manufactured and claim that the term itself was created to criminalize European, ethnically Russian people who were targeted during the Red ‘Russian’ Bolshevik regime.
These opinions highlight a deep skepticism towards the current discussions and actions surrounding Indigenous Australian rights. They advocate for a reexamination of the Aboriginal Industry and the exclusion of certain individuals from identifying as Indigenous. This perspective argues against the notion of systemic racism and maintains that individuals who do not have Australian Aboriginal ancestry should not be entitled to the benefits and entitlements meant for the Indigenous population.
It is important to note that this perspective represents only one side of the ongoing debate about indigenous rights in Australia and does not reflect the views of all Australians or experts in the field. The issue of Indigenous rights is complex and multifaceted, with a range of opinions and perspectives that need to be considered for a comprehensive understanding of the topic.
Source link
