Dolores Cahill: Law Versus Legal: Banking (Part 1)
By Linda Summer
Dolores Cahill: Law versus legal: Banking (Part 1):
Lawful:
Sovereign Man/Women/alive/money/commodity/asset-backed
versus
legal:
Corporations/Title/Mr.Ms/ALL CAPITAL LETTERS/not alive/fiction/fictional entity/trusts/legal trust/constructive trust/fiat/securities/nothing-backed:
With all the discussion on CBDC’s, digital IDs, local banks, money, cash, it shines a Spotlight on the operation of Law & Money in our Nations & Lawful Money, Lawful Banking & how it supports the Nation & the People, including locally:
The genius & enterprise of the People of a Nation are one key wealth of the Nation & supported by Lawful Money:
Landscape mapping:
Law & Money: Some Questions:
What is the Money in the Nation?
Is the Money asset backed?
Does the Money meet the Lawful definition?
Does the Money/Banking system belong to the People of the Nation?
Is there a National Bank?
Does the National Bank give Money in Law to the People of the Nation?
Does the National Bank give Money to develop the Nation for the People?
Is there a ‘Central Bank’?
Is it owned by the People of the Nation?
Does the National Bank/Central Bank assist local banks, to support local People & families, supporting indigenous methods of farming, tourism, culture & heritage?
Please share & join
@DoloresCahill on Telegram 💞
Additional talks from Prof. Werner on Banking & Community Banks:
Prof. Richard Werner is a leading researcher, academic & author on Central Banks & the Banking Industry who has an ability to explain Money & Banking in a comprehensive, clear & easily understandable way.
Here, Prof. Richard Werner speaks on:
The Need For Community Banks (37 minutes):
“The FED didn’t step in (to save Silicon Valley Bank) so it’s pretty much an orchestrated takedown as the central Bankers want to reduce the number of banks under the ECB:
In Europe 5,000 banks have already disappeared:
Under the FED in the last 30 years almost 10,000 have disappeared:
They want to centralize banks and use CBDC’S to get rid of all the banks … there will ultimately only be one Bank left; like in the Soviet system:
So my main argument is let’s set up new very soundly managed Community Banks …. I myself have been doing the same thing with Hampshire Community Bank; something I’ve worked for 10 years to set up : https://hampshirebank.org/about/
The Regulators have not exactly been falling over themselves to encourage this:
If you want to set up a bank for the super rich they get their banking license in six months so there’s clearly resistance but it can be done and every Community should have one or two local Community Banks and we should all demand this and then I think attitudes will start to change if the regulars realise that.. people are demanding this because it can be done very effectively:
In Germany, the economy has been doing very well for 200 years despite shocks and crises because it has the largest number of small local banks, 80 percent of the banks are locally headquartered Community Banks that only lend in the local area.
So the bank is always the same boat as the local small firms then you get the right decisions you don’t get the nonsense and speculation.”
Taken from a panel debate at the Hay on Wye HowTheLightGetsIn Festival on 27 May 2023 with Gillian Tett of the Financial Times in Washington, D.C. on videolink and Guy Standing and Richard Werner in person:
In this 2 minute excerpt, from May 2023, Prof. Werner, explains the consequences of allowing the banks to go bust in the United States & abroad.
https://t.me/Doctorsforcovidethics/867
He provides a historical account of how bank failures have had significant adverse impacts on the economy. Additionally, he discusses the importance of small, community banks to ensure individual and national sovereignty & one of his related articles:
‘Why a Sovereign State Bank Is Good for Tennessee’ at the Solari Report:
https://home.solari.com/why-a-sovereign-state-bank-is-good-for-tennessee/
Prof. Richard Werner’s Telegram channel:
https://t.me/WernerEconomics
