October 4, 2023 10:36 pm

Interpretation of Court: Day 4 – 2 June 2022 – Brisbane Supreme Court

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
WhatsApp
Telegram

URGENT: JUST 11 DAYS REMAIN TO HELP SAVE INDEPENDENT MEDIA & ANR, TO ENSURE WE ARE FULLY FUNDED FOR NEXT MONTH,SO LET'S CUT THE BS & GET TO THE POINT - WE WILL BE FORCED LAY OFF STAFF & REDUCE OPERATIONS UNLESS WE ARE FULLY FUNDED WITHIN THE NEXT 2 WEEKS - Sadly, less than 0.5% of readers currently donate or subscribe to us But YOU can easily change that. Imagine the impact we'd make if 3 in 10 readers supported us today. To start with we’d remove this annoying banner as we could fight for a full year...

Interpretation of Court: Day 4 – 2 June 2022 – Brisbane Supreme Court

By Truth Seekers-Channel

I will just put it here for you guys.

Interpretation of court today:
DAY 4 – 2 JUNE 2022 – BRISBANE SUPREME COURT

This morning they had prof Paul Griffin (director of infectious disease at mater, a medical doctor and researcher and vaccine Advocate plus coi with Astrazeneca and they mentioned something about Pfizer…. (He advises people on improving vaccine uptake, same as Holly Seale)

So for someone so credentialled he was using the “economist” magazine as a source of modelling for under reported covid deaths. He tabled documents saying covid mortality was 20-40% but finally admitted that might be in over 90 and way back in early 2020.

He was caught out using mortality Graphs from a website called “info is beautiful” with no knowledge of the data behind the graphs. He did not think natural immunity was relevant and after a long long time he admitted that mortality was about 0.01% for under 60 and probably lower if you included asymptomatic infections GOOD GRIEF, is this guy for real.

Then the deputy police commissioner is up next I’m the box, under oath (he got thrown under the bus by the commissioner yesterday)
At the start it was thought he was counter arguing with paper trails to defend himself but then it was slowly realised he was equally as incompetent as his boss (the blonde fuhrer), Seale and Griffin were.

There were significant differences in timelines between his paper trail and the CoP account (she claimed she didn’t discuss mandates until a few days before the Sept 7 2021 mandate but he showed paperwork from almost 3 weeks earlier…WHOOPS.

Turns out, he was almost solely responsible for getting the mandate document together. He consulted crown law regarding a human rights compatabilty test but wrote up his interpretation of that verbal consultation to present to CoP prior to crown law actually verifying it.

It seems he failed to disclose that there were two human rights documents and he tabled version 2 only..whoops…Version 1 only had medical and religious exemptions and after the mandate was initiated they were informed this violated the rights of those that conscientiously objected, so they added the extra “exceptional circumstances”…He admitted that was only to comply with crown law and they never intended to grant exemption to conscientious objection..OH DEAR ME…WHOOPS.

The police involved in these cases have an injunction order over them that prevents action until the outcomes of these trials, but in Feb the deputy sought crown law advice to remove the injunction so he could terminate the police…OH, REALLY…

He was asked if that was the only options explored and he answered “that was the only one I was exploring”…. Some of that detail was argued to be privileged and the lawyer for the police asked that to be waived given the inconsistency of testimony between deputy and commissioner (that decision is pending)….I BELIEVE DEPUTY SMITH HAS AGAIN BE CAUGHT OUT IN A BLATANT LIE..WHOOPS.

Then he was asked about his definition of informed consent (it really was clever questioning) and he gave the same definition we use in our case, he was then led into whether any form of pressure or coercion would negate informed consent to which he said it would…well, fancy that, whadda-ya-know

He was then led into whether any form of discipline or threats to employment might be considered “pressure and coercion” and he answered that it was and that ergo, informed consent could not be given …WHOOPS

Tomorrow will be great because all of this will be re-explored…with the blonde fuhrer expected to be in the witness box for up to 6 hours.

I GUARANTEE THE PHONES OF THESE ABSOLUTE GRUBS ARE RUNNING RED HOT TONIGHT

LIARS & CHEATS NEVER PROSPER BOYS AND GIRLS
INTEGRITY AND MORALS RULE

Opinion pieces don’t necessarily reflect the position of our news site but of our Opinion writers.

Support the ANR from as little as $8 – it only takes a minute. If you can, please consider supporting us with a regular amount each month. Thank you.

Related News

Subscribe for free to our ANR news emails and access 2 free ebooks plus Reports to share with family and friends about Covid fraud and the danger of the vaccines.

Australian National Review is Australia’s first real free and independent press, one with no editorial control by the elite, but a publication that can generate critical thinkers and critical debate and hold those spreading mistruths and deliberate propaganda in mainstream media to account.

News with a difference that will be educational, compelling and create a platform for political and social change in this country and address the real issues facing this country and the world.

Watch Full Documentary

URGENT: JUST 3 DAYS REMAIN TO HELP SAVE INDEPENDENT MEDIA & ANR, SO LET'S CUT THE BS & GET TO THE POINT - WE WILL BE FORCED TO LAY OFF STAFF & REDUCE OPERATIONS UNLESS WE ARE FULLY FUNDED WITHIN THE NEXT 2 WEEKS

Sadly, less than 0.5% of readers currently donate or subscribe to us But YOU can easily change that. Imagine the impact we'd make if 3 in 10 readers supported us today. To start with we’d remove this annoying banner as we could fight for a full year...

Get access to TruthMed- how to save your family and friends that have been vaxx with vaccine detox, & how the Unvaxxed can prevent spike protein infection from the jabbed.

Free with ANR Subscription from $8

Download the Full PDF - THE COVID-19 FRAUD & WAR ON HUMANITY