NSW Police Officer Belinda Hocroft Wins Court Case Claiming Mandated Vaxxine Is Unlawful and Incorrect

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on pinterest
Pinterest
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on telegram
Telegram

NSW Police Officer Belinda Hocroft Wins Court Case Claiming Mandated Vaxxine Is Unlawful and Incorrect

By Sydney National Review

For anyone following the Court proceedings against Hazzard, the Hocroft vs Hazzard case was settled out of court in favour of the Plaintiff (Hocroft) Thank you Anestis Mantzouranis. This was the case of NSW Police officer Belinda Hocroft who was told that she needed at least the first shot by September 19th or she would be fired and not be able to return to her work.

Belinda was represented by Charly Tannous of Sage Solicitors who argued that Belinda, a mother of four, was very concerned about the long term effects of the vaccine and felt it was a breach of her right to choose. This case now becomes a reference case for anyone else in the same position, and sets a precedent that proves that the Government claim of mandate is UNLAWFUL and INCORRECT.

This should encourage everyone in the same position to hold on to your values, to fight back where you are being coerced and to know that you are on the right side of history! It sets a precedent for everywhere in Australia. We now have a reference. LETS GO FOR IT AUSTRALIA


Here’s what others had to say:

Leanne Dunn
We need more cases to win and get rid of this crap

Figster
Does anybody know what the settlement was? Obviously not getting your profession back? I am a teacher in nsw, obviously can’t work any more. I would love to be compensated for loss of livelyhood and begin my own educational business.

Bruce Langford
Doesn’t a settlement out of court mean that there is now NO precedent in the courts?

Bazzard
Why wasn’t this settled in court? If this is true, then wouldn’t it be more socially responsible to take it all the way through the court system, versus hidden like this?

*Note We Deliberately Miss Spell Some Words or Add Capital Letters To Get Around Big Tech Censoring.

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on pinterest
Pinterest
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on telegram
Telegram

Truthbook.social offering hundreds of thousands in giveaways for those joining its new social media platform as many desert Facebook in droves because of censoring

Here is some of the current incentives being offered to new users

Join www.truthbook.social our new social media platform backed by Independent Media. where you can speak the truth, and not be banned. Plus you'll receive $50 USD in www.truthcoin.social,the crypto currency backing the project, when you join, plus a lot more for sharing posts. www.truthbook.social

Subscribe for free to our ANR news emails and access 2 free ebooks plus Reports to share with family and friends about Covid fraud and the danger of the vaccines.

For ANR Smaller Donors please donate below to help fund our critical not for profit work. Together we can defeat mainstream media.

We are a not for profit Independent Media Company which survives off donations, even as little as $5 per month . Please donate now to help fund our work

Truthcoin Offer

$1000 USD turns into Now $6000 Truthcoin
$2,500 USD turns into Now $25,000 Truthcoin
$5000 USD turns into Now $65,000 Truthcoin
$10,000 USD turns into Now $150,000 Truthcoin
$15,000 USD turns into Now $250,000 Truthcoin
$50,000 USD turns into Now $1.15 Million Truthcoin
$100,000 USD turns into Now $2.5 Million Truthcoin

6 Responses

    1. Dismissed by consent just means the court proceeding no longer needs to go ahead because the parties came to an agreement outside of court. Settlements are confidential and “without prejudice”. They do not set precedents.

  1. Settle doutside of court:
    It’s called money talks, justice walks.
    Anyone without strong morals or ethics will succumb to a golden handshake, where one will concede if paid a large sum.
    Except this is not business, so it is called a dirty handshake.

  2. Settlement outside of court is confidential. It does not set a precedent and cannot be used in future court cases. A settlement is without prejudice and without admission of liability. It does absolutely nothing for no one except the plaintiff. Please check facts as it is gives people false hope.

  3. Did she sue Brad Hazzard as an individual or as a minister of the NSW Government? If it’s the latter, a simple FOI request should be all one would need to find out the details of the settlement. I’m joking of course – no government today would willing let the taxpayers know what they’re doing with taxpayers’ money! Hahahaha!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Play Video

McIntyre Report
Political Talk Show

We are a not for profit Independent Media Company which survives off donations, even as little as $5 per month . Please donate now to help fund our work

Raw Report

Ryan Jackson Saw show

in USD

in AUD

in GBP

in CAD

Jamie McIntyre

ANR on

Currency Exchange Rates in AUD

Live and updated every minute of the day

Current Price of Bitcoin 2.0
0.10 on Azbit

Nurses Speak Out

ANR Meme Report

with Nadine Roberts

Episode 002

21st Century Political System

Play Video

Editor's Pick

Get our free News Emails on latest articles, alerts and solutions for both legal templates and ways to help fight back against the Globalists vax Mandates , and health resources to boost your immune system and ways to Protect from deadly EMF 5G radiation and more.

FREE E-BOOKS AND REPORTS ALSO

Download the Full PDF - THE COVID-19 FRAUD & WAR ON HUMANITY