Pub To Lay Charges of Mass Murder by Government Policy
Over the course of the past sixteen months, whilst building the case for pandemic fraud against the Four Horsemen of COVID-1984, the PUB team has been concurrently amassing evidence of mass murder by government policy in UK hospitals, care homes and hospices.
Now, in the aftermath of the inherently void decision of the Deputy Chief Magistrate [DCM] to dismiss our Private Criminal Prosecution [PCP] against Hancock, Whitty, Vallance and Ferguson for pandemic fraud, we have more than enough incontrovertible prima facie evidence to lay a case for mass murder of the very people the UK Government’s health policies are supposed to be protecting.
Moreover, we have now established a comprehensive database of evidence which exposes every individual in the supply chain of Midazolam, Morphine and the Flu and COVID vaxxes, from Hancock down to the ‘medical officers’ who administered them, to criminal prosecution for mass murder.
The Elements of Murder
According to the Crown Prosecution Service [CPS] website, subject to three exceptions, the crime of murder is committed, where a person:
- Of sound mind and discretion (i.e. sane);
- unlawfully kills (i.e. not self-defence or other justified killing);
- any reasonable creature (human being);
- in being (born alive and breathing through its own lungs – Rance v Mid-Downs Health Authority (1991) 1 All ER 801 and AG Ref No 3 of 1994 (1997) 3 All ER 936;
- under the Queen’s Peace (not in war-time);
- with intent to kill or cause grievous bodily harm (GBH).
Murder cannot be proven in a court of law unless it can be demonstrated that the accused acted with intent. The intent for murder is an intention to kill or cause grievous bodily harm (GBH).
The necessary intention exists if the defendant feels sure that death, or serious bodily harm, is a virtual certainty as a result of the defendant’s actions and that the defendant appreciated that this was the case – R v Matthews (Darren John)  EWCA Crim 192.
The prosecution must show a causal link between the act/omission and the death. The act or omission must be a substantial cause of death, but it need not be the sole or main cause of death.
It must have “more than minimally negligibly or trivially contributed to the death” – Lord Woolf MR in R v HM Coroner for Inner London ex p Douglas-Williams  1 All ER 344.
It does not matter that the act/omission by the defendant merely “hastened” the victim’s death: R v Dyson (1908) 1 Cr App R 13.”
The defendant must take his victim as he finds him under the ‘egg-shell skull’ rule: R v LeBrun (1991) 4 All ER 673.
As a result, any pre-dispositions or inherent weaknesses or vulnerabilities of the victim are deemed irrelevant, for the purposes of proving causation.
The most shocking evidence we have in our possession is the House of Commons video confession by Dr Luke Evans and Matt Hancock, which unequivocally confirms that the primary cause of death among those deaths attributed to the 1st and 2nd waves of COVID deaths in the spring and autumn of 2020 was a lethal cocktail of Midazolam and Morphine.
Especially when considered alongside our December 2020 predictions of how many people would die during the Flu and COVID ‘vaccine’ roll-outs, with a 98% degree of accuracy.
In other words, if you’re over 65 and the vaxxes don’t kill you, you’ll be listed to be Midazolammed on opiates at the earliest opportunity, to save money that might otherwise be spent keeping you alive for many years to come.
It therefore cannot be sensibly argued that what Evans and Hancock said under oath in the three minute video below does not constitute emphatic proof that they intended to kill everybody they injected with Midazolam and Morphine, to give them “a good death”.
Despite the disgraceful fact that Evans and Hancock discuss giving “a good death” to those who are arbitrarily injected with their lethal concoctions, as if doing so was a morally righteous policy for the government to implement, doing so in British hospitals, care homes and hospices, where the over 65’s were targeted for elimination by this method, was and remains tantamount to mass murder by government policy.
However, the primary ramification of the damning new evidence that has come to light since we filed the PCP against the Four Horsemen for pandemic fraud in February this year is that the Criminal Procedure Rules and Practice Directions prohibit laying it in an appeal of the DCM’s order dismissing our expert witness testimony as ‘hearsay’; meaning we can only rely upon the evidence he based his decision on if we appeal it.
Furthermore, information has come to light over the course of recent events which suggests that the DCM’s plainly void order was issued for the purpose of deliberately provoking an appeal to the High Court – such are the flimsy grounds the judge relied upon to justify his decision.
Our reasoning for this deduction is simple:
- The DCM doesn’t have the jurisdiction to issue Civil Restraint Orders but he did elect to dismiss the case as having an “inappropriate purpose”, which guarantees that the appeal judge must consider whether to issue such restraint, in the event the application is dismissed.
- A High Court judge does have such jurisdiction and could feasibly ban the Trustees of the People’s Union of Britain [PUB] from bringing any legal proceedings in any of Her Majesty’s Courts for up to two years, in a desperate attempt kill our case stone dead by dismissing it as ‘vexatious’.
Murder Charges To Be Laid
It therefore naturally follows that we have decided to sidestep the trap our adversaries appear to have set for us by dispensing with the plan to appeal the void order and issuing new proceedings in a different Magistrates Court, alleging both pandemic fraud and mass murder by government policy, which we are aiming to do within the next two weeks.
These charges are also in the process of being filed with every Chief Police Officer, demanding that they immediately commence investigations into the overwhelming evidence that people are being exterminated in hospitals, care homes and hospices in every regional jurisdiction nationwide.
From which it naturally emerges that the perpetrators of these truly heinous crimes committed the multitude of pandemic frauds already documented in our case in order to create an alibi for themselves – that they were trying to save the very people they were systematically murdering with Midazolam, Morphine and ‘Vaccines’.
This devastating new evidence will no doubt result in the frantic clenching of butt-cheeks in Westminster, where those who have already publicly confessed their intent to commit mass murder under oath will be filling their designer undercrackers with the fecal fruits of the abject fear that their profoundly arrogant and myopic wrongdoings will now be exposed to the watching world and that history will ultimately condemn their actions and those of their accomplices as perhaps the most profoundly evil crimes ever perpetrated.