September 28, 2023 11:06 am

Simply using the old ‘stop spreading conspiracy theories’ as the foundation of your argument against a contradictory narrative to the mainstream narrative is an illogical argument and a symptom of delusional thinking, not critical thinking.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
WhatsApp
Telegram

URGENT: JUST 11 DAYS REMAIN TO HELP SAVE INDEPENDENT MEDIA & ANR, TO ENSURE WE ARE FULLY FUNDED FOR NEXT MONTH,SO LET'S CUT THE BS & GET TO THE POINT - WE WILL BE FORCED LAY OFF STAFF & REDUCE OPERATIONS UNLESS WE ARE FULLY FUNDED WITHIN THE NEXT 2 WEEKS - Sadly, less than 0.5% of readers currently donate or subscribe to us But YOU can easily change that. Imagine the impact we'd make if 3 in 10 readers supported us today. To start with we’d remove this annoying banner as we could fight for a full year...

Simply using the old ‘stop spreading conspiracy theories’ as the foundation of your argument against a contradictory narrative to the mainstream narrative is an illogical argument and a symptom of delusional thinking, not critical thinking.

By Guru-Shakti Dasa

This kind of argument is used by the mainstream to defend their narrative.

It is planted into the heads of the complicit via influential controlled media.

The very mainstream media you use (often so arrogantly) as the source of your (unquestionable) facts to refute alternate theories (potentially facts if you actually looked) are the ones alleged to be fully complicit in the conspiracy. Their so-called experts and the educational institutions or research centers, the so-called world and national health institutes and organisations, the many national and state governments and the very wealthy who fund them all stand accused of playing a part in a global conspiracy.

To use them and information sourced from them and to ignore looking at the evidence against them because you have been told by them that anything contrary to what they tell you is a lie (conspiracy theory) is insanely illogical.

Let’s draw an analogy for this kind of brain numbing illogic.

Prosecution brings charges against a person for murder. In court, the charged speaks with the magistrate/judge and provides his/her defense along with stating that the prosectuion are just liars (conspiracy theorists) and have nothing of value to state in the case.

When the prosecution attempt to present their case the magistrate interrupts them and simply says “you are liars and stop spreading your false allegations (conspiracy theories) around here”.

Whenever the prosecution tries to counter such an illogical argument with facts from the murder scene (DNA of the accused on the murder weapon etc…) they are simply shut down by the magistrate who uses only what the murderer has told him/her to counter the prosecution.

Is that reasonable?

Is that a good magistrate/judge?

Would there be any justice in that?

Is there any genuine evidence of facts in that?

Is the judge actually acting as a judge or simply as an advocate for the accused?

So, if you have answered these correctly you will know that those who so proudly and arrogantly shut down ‘conspiracy theorists’ in such a manner are not judges but are simply brainwashed advocates for the accused.

This is, of course, obvious to those trying to introduce contradictory facts to the accused’s narrative, but it is not obvious to the illogical advocates of the alleged global conspiracists who stand charged by an ever-growing number of the population.

In this day and age; he who controls the narrative, who influences the narrative, controls the world, not he who has all the facts.

The majority of the world are so conditioned by the accused that they cannot recognise a fact if it is beaten against their heads a hundred times. Only when the soldiers of the accused and their boots are trampling over your heads and your children’s heads will it dawn on you that “hey, just maybe I should not have listened solely to the words of those who stood accused of murder”.

Opinion pieces don’t necessarily reflect the position of our news site but of our Opinion writers.

Support the ANR from as little as $8 – it only takes a minute. If you can, please consider supporting us with a regular amount each month. Thank you.

Related News

Subscribe for free to our ANR news emails and access 2 free ebooks plus Reports to share with family and friends about Covid fraud and the danger of the vaccines.

Australian National Review is Australia’s first real free and independent press, one with no editorial control by the elite, but a publication that can generate critical thinkers and critical debate and hold those spreading mistruths and deliberate propaganda in mainstream media to account.

News with a difference that will be educational, compelling and create a platform for political and social change in this country and address the real issues facing this country and the world.

Watch Full Documentary

URGENT: JUST 3 DAYS REMAIN TO HELP SAVE INDEPENDENT MEDIA & ANR, SO LET'S CUT THE BS & GET TO THE POINT - WE WILL BE FORCED TO LAY OFF STAFF & REDUCE OPERATIONS UNLESS WE ARE FULLY FUNDED WITHIN THE NEXT 2 WEEKS

Sadly, less than 0.5% of readers currently donate or subscribe to us But YOU can easily change that. Imagine the impact we'd make if 3 in 10 readers supported us today. To start with we’d remove this annoying banner as we could fight for a full year...

Get access to TruthMed- how to save your family and friends that have been vaxx with vaccine detox, & how the Unvaxxed can prevent spike protein infection from the jabbed.

Free with ANR Subscription from $8

Download the Full PDF - THE COVID-19 FRAUD & WAR ON HUMANITY