December 2, 2023 5:42 am

UK minister compares BBC’s Gaza reporting to ‘blood libel’ — RT World News

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
WhatsApp
Telegram

URGENT: JUST 11 DAYS REMAIN TO HELP SAVE INDEPENDENT MEDIA & ANR, TO ENSURE WE ARE FULLY FUNDED FOR NEXT MONTH,SO LET'S CUT THE BS & GET TO THE POINT - WE WILL BE FORCED LAY OFF STAFF & REDUCE OPERATIONS UNLESS WE ARE FULLY FUNDED WITHIN THE NEXT 2 WEEKS - Sadly, less than 0.5% of readers currently donate or subscribe to us But YOU can easily change that. Imagine the impact we'd make if 3 in 10 readers supported us today. To start with we’d remove this annoying banner as we could fight for a full year...

British Immigration Minister Robert Jenrick has criticized the BBC’s coverage of the Hamas-Israel conflict, comparing it to an anti-Semitic “blood libel.” The public broadcaster has faced backlash from multiple UK officials regarding its reporting on the attack on the Al-Ahli Arab Hospital in Gaza City on October 17th, with both Israel and Palestinian officials blaming each other.

Jenrick took to social media platform X (formerly Twitter) to express his views on the matter. He stated, “The reporting of the tragic explosion at the Al-Ahli hospital by the BBC and others was like a 21st-century blood libel.” Blood libels historically were false accusations claiming that Jews killed Christian babies for ritual purposes.

Jenrick’s post was in response to MP Stephen Crabb’s question during a parliamentary debate. Crabb criticized “sections of the British media” for relying on information from “officials in terrorist-controlled Gaza” when reporting on the hospital strike. He also highlighted the anti-Semitic comments that circulated on social media after the incident, requesting Prime Minister Rishi Sunak warn that any information coming from Hamas should be treated with scrutiny and cross-examination.

PM Sunak agreed that judgment should not be rushed before all the facts are known about the tragedy. He emphasized the responsibility of those in positions of authority, both in the House and the media, to be cautious with their words. Sunak assured that the government was working with allies to ascertain the truth of what happened.

British Foreign Secretary James Cleverly echoed Sunak’s sentiments, urging people to wait for the facts and report them accurately. He criticized the rush to conclusions surrounding the loss of life at Al-Ahli hospital.

The allegations of biased reporting also reached Israel, with IDF spokesman Jonathan Conricus accusing UK media of double standards. Conricus specifically criticized the BBC for unfair questioning during an interview that implied Israel’s responsibility for the deaths in Al-Ahli. The BBC recently confirmed an investigation into alleged anti-Israel bias and support for Hamas among some of its staff members.

The BBC has faced criticism from both the pro-Israeli and pro-Palestinian camps. The broadcaster apologized for its misleading description of demonstrations in support of Palestine in the UK, clarifying that they were not rallies of Hamas supporters. Pro-Palestinian group Palestine Action protested outside the BBC’s London office, claiming that the news corporation was spreading Israeli lies.

The BBC has defended itself, stating that it upholds the principle of impartiality. John Simpson, the broadcaster’s world affairs editor, emphasized the high standard to which the BBC is held and the importance of objectivity in its reporting.

The BBC’s coverage of the Hamas-Israel conflict has sparked controversy and drawn criticism from various UK officials. The debate around the reporting highlights the challenges faced by media organizations in maintaining objectivity and accurate reporting in highly sensitive and politically charged situations.

Source link

Opinion pieces don’t necessarily reflect the position of our news site but of our Opinion writers.

Original Source: UK minister compares BBC’s Gaza reporting to ‘blood libel’ — RT World News

Support the ANR from as little as $8 – it only takes a minute. If you can, please consider supporting us with a regular amount each month. Thank you.

Related News

Subscribe for free to our ANR news emails and access 2 free ebooks plus Reports to share with family and friends about Covid fraud and the danger of the vaccines.

Australian National Review is Australia’s first real free and independent press, one with no editorial control by the elite, but a publication that can generate critical thinkers and critical debate and hold those spreading mistruths and deliberate propaganda in mainstream media to account.

News with a difference that will be educational, compelling and create a platform for political and social change in this country and address the real issues facing this country and the world.

Watch Full Documentary

URGENT: JUST 3 DAYS REMAIN TO HELP SAVE INDEPENDENT MEDIA & ANR, SO LET'S CUT THE BS & GET TO THE POINT - WE WILL BE FORCED TO LAY OFF STAFF & REDUCE OPERATIONS UNLESS WE ARE FULLY FUNDED WITHIN THE NEXT 2 WEEKS

Sadly, less than 0.5% of readers currently donate or subscribe to us But YOU can easily change that. Imagine the impact we'd make if 3 in 10 readers supported us today. To start with we’d remove this annoying banner as we could fight for a full year...

Get access to TruthMed- how to save your family and friends that have been vaxx with vaccine detox, & how the Unvaxxed can prevent spike protein infection from the jabbed.

Free with ANR Subscription from $8

Download the Full PDF - THE COVID-19 FRAUD & WAR ON HUMANITY